the green why
← all routes
Route · 3 steps

What is emptiness in Buddhism — and why did the west take it seriously?

Buddhism: from enlightenment to the philosophy of emptiness — and why it matters in the West

Buddhism began not with a doctrine but with an experience. Siddhartha Gautama saw suffering — and went away to understand it. What he found overturned the thinking of two continents. This route runs from the first enlightenment to Nagarjuna's philosophy of emptiness, and on to how Schopenhauer opened up the Buddha for Europe — half a century before it became fashionable.

Step 1 of 3

Gautama is the starting point. The Four Noble Truths: life is suffering, dukkha; suffering has a cause; the cause is craving; there is a path to the ending of craving. This is not pessimism — it is a diagnosis and a cure.

But the Buddha's teaching was handed on by word of mouth, and it changed. Five centuries later came a man who put an impossible question to Buddhist philosophy: what exists at all?
Step 2 of 3
Nagarjuna

Nagarjuna created Madhyamaka — the philosophy of the middle way between being and non-being. His central notion: śūnyatā, emptiness. No thing exists in and of itself — only in dependence on others. This is more radical than it sounds: what is called into question is the “I” itself.

Seventeen centuries later a German philosopher read the first translations of Buddhist texts — and recognised in them what he had arrived at on his own.
Step 3 of 3

Schopenhauer was no Buddhist — but his “The World as Will and Representation” reached similar conclusions by another road: behind suffering stands a blind will to life, and release lies in the denial of that will. He was the first in Western philosophy to set Buddhism on a level with Kant.

If the “I” is an illusion, as Buddhists claim, then who is it that practises meditation and strives for enlightenment?

A route is a road through ideas on one question. All of them meet in the arc.
© A.M.Sh. Write: hello@thegreenwhy.org
🇬🇧EN